Recent Articles

Gendered disinformation as violence: A new analytical agenda
Marília Gehrke and Eedan R. Amit-Danhi
The potential for harm entrenched in mis- and disinformation content, regardless of intentionality, opens space for a new analytical agenda to investigate the weaponization of identity-based features like gender, race, and ethnicity through the lens of violence. Therefore, we lay out the triangle of violence to support new studies aiming to investigate multimedia content, victims, and audiences of false claims.

Feedback and education improve human detection of image manipulation on social media
Adnan Hoq, Matthew J. Facciani and Tim Weninger
This study investigates the impact of educational interventions and feedback on users’ ability to detect manipulated images on social media, addressing a gap in research that has primarily focused on algorithmic approaches. Through a pre-registered randomized and controlled experiment, we found that feedback and educational content significantly improved participants’ ability to detect manipulated images on social media.

Disagreement as a way to study misinformation and its effects
Damian Hodel and Jevin D. West
Experts consider misinformation a significant societal concern due to its associated problems like political polarization, erosion of trust, and public health challenges. However, these broad effects can occur independently of misinformation, illustrating a misalignment with the narrow focus of the prevailing misinformation concept.

State media tagging does not affect perceived tweet accuracy: Evidence from a U.S. Twitter experiment in 2022
Claire Betzer, Montgomery Booth, Beatrice Cappio, Alice Cook, Madeline Gochee, Benjamin Grayzel, Leyla Jacoby, Sharanya Majumder, Michael Manda, Jennifer Qian, Mitchell Ransden, Miles Rubens, Mihir Sardesai, Eleanor Sullivan, Harish Tekriwal, Ryan Waaland and Brendan Nyhan
State media outlets spread propaganda disguised as news online, prompting social media platforms to attach state-affiliated media tags to their accounts. Do these tags reduce belief in state media misinformation? Previous studies suggest the tags reduce misperceptions but focus on Russia, and current research does not compare these tags with other interventions.

How alt-tech users evaluate search engines: Cause-advancing audits
Evan M. Williams and Kathleen M. Carley
Search engine audit studies—where researchers query a set of terms in one or more search engines and analyze the results—have long been instrumental in assessing the relative reliability of search engines. However, on alt-tech platforms, users often conduct a different form of search engine audit.

The origin of public concerns over AI supercharging misinformation in the 2024 U.S. presidential election
Harry Yaojun Yan, Garrett Morrow, Kai-Cheng Yang and John Wihbey
We surveyed 1,000 U.S. adults to understand concerns about the use of artificial intelligence (AI) during the 2024 U.S. presidential election and public perceptions of AI-driven misinformation. Four out of five respondents expressed some level of worry about AI’s role in election misinformation.
Explore by Topic
- Artificial Intelligence
- Asia
- Big Data
- Conspiracy Theories
- Content Moderation
- COVID-19
- Debunking
- Disinformation
- Editorial
- Education
- Elections
- Emotion
- Europe
- Fact-checking
- Fake News
- Gaming
- Healthcare
- Impact
- Information Bias
- Law & Government
- Mainstream Media
- Media Literacy
- Partisan Issues
- Philosophy
- Platform Regulation
- Platforms
- Politics
- Propaganda
- Psychology
- Public Health
- Public Opinion
- Research
- Russia
- Search engines
- Social Media
- Sources
- Twitter/X
- Vaccines
- Youth
- Youtube